Hm... When I look at the title of the previous post, I see that there is quite a difference between all as one, and all as (the transcendent) I. What I wanted to convey is all as the transcendent I, but I wrote "one" instead to avoid the misunderstanding of all as the ego-I, which of course is quite different.
Ego-I and transcendent-I
The ego-I is the sense of a separate I, placed on this individual.
And the transcendent-I is the I of Big Mind, of awake emptiness and form, absent of any separate I anywhere.
All as ego-I is massive inflation... insanity. But all as the transcendent-I is the supreme sanity...
In the dream, what was - and is - alive is all as a felt-sense of the transcendent I.
All as one
All as one is the soft version of it, as it allows a sense of a separate I which somehow is not separate from anything else. It is all a seamless field, but there is still a vague sense of I here placed on this individual soul and human self.
This is the safe ground, where we get the best of both worlds. I get to feel not separate from anything else, which is good, and then I also get to maintain a sense of I here placed on this individual. It feels good, without rocking the boat too much. It is still relatively familiar, and my identity doesn't change that much.
All as transcendent I
And all as the transcendent I is very different. it is far more radical. It does away with the separate self-sense all together. It completely eradicates any sense of a separate I placed on this individual self. It is the I that transcends the formless and all form, it is the one I everywhere and always.
It wipes out anything familiar, any identity at all. Nothing is left. Just this one I, everywhere and always, no more present in this individual than in any other (although it is functionally connected with this particular individual, for the time being).
This is the complete death of any individual self-sense, of any fixed identity. This is what differentiates sticking the toes in the water, and taking the plunge. It is what separates a dabbling in awakening as Big Mind, and taking the full consequence of it.
Why one, and not transcendent I?
So why did I write "all as one" and not "transcendent I", although that is what was - and is - alive for me? Partly to not confuse it with the inflation of the ego-I, but also partly because the fear of taking the plunge is real... It is a real fear, a terror... It is the ultimate death of any sense of separate I, of any continuous identity. A plunge into something beyond all of this, something unknown, and also very familiar.
I know, at several levels, that taking the plunge only leaves behind what has always been an illusion anyway, and that what is plunged into will be strangely and intimately familiar... Yet, there is also a hesitation here, a holding back... Am I ready? Willing? Will it happen even if I make myself more consciously available to it?