<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d4053797\x26blogName\x3dMystery+of+Existence\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dTAN\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttp://absentofi.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://absentofi.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-1678461117858410414', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

Inquiry

I went to Portland Friday for a deeksha, and it helped me find a good deal of material for inquiry.

In the past, I have only received deeksha from one particular person (JLW), and I appreciate his approach very much. It is simple, grounded, and comes from a very mature view and familiarity with transdual spirituality (including from Buddhism). There is no extra.

This time, the deeksha came in a very different packaging (RT). One that happened to trigger a good deal in me - especially as I physically was already pretty run down that day.

Some of the many judgments triggered in me:

  • Instead of being brief and concise, he went on and on - in an incoherent and rambling way. Why not reduce the words to a minimum, and get on with the essence of it: the deeksha?

  • Instead of talking about it in a grounded and solid way, it came out as a seemingly endless rambling of half-baked new age fluff. Why go on about it in such a half-baked way, when it can be made simple, brief and grounded?

  • He took on a sickening "spiritual" persona, through his tone of voice and whole appearance, instead of just being a regular ordinary human being. Why add the extra to it, when it can be so simple? Why take on a persona in this way, when who you really are - simply, fully, as a human being - is the magic? Why be half when you can be whole?

  • He expressed it in a quite dualistic context, simplisticly "pro-awakening" without acknowledging the other side (God also as delusion, resistance etc.). Why take something that can be expressed beautifully in a more transdual way, and reduce it by making it appear one-sided and dualistic?
So there is lots of material here.

[specific inquiries to come]

You can leave your response or bookmark this post to del.icio.us by using the links below.
Comment | Bookmark | Go to end